Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) Task

Field

Value

Name

Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) Task

Version

main (1.0)

URL / Repository

https://github.com/TaskBeacon/MID

Short Description

A task measuring reward anticipation and feedback processing using adaptive timing

Created By

Zhipeng Cao (zhipeng30@foxmail.com)

Date Updated

2025/06/21

PsyFlow Version

0.1.0

PsychoPy Version

2025.1.1

Modality

Behavior/EEG

Language

Chinese

Voice Name

zh-CN-YunyangNeural

1. Task Overview

The Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) Task is designed to assess reward processing and motivational control. Participants respond to brief target stimuli that follow cues indicating potential monetary gain, loss, or neutral outcomes. By analyzing reaction times and success rates, the task evaluates anticipatory and feedback-related cognitive processes. An adaptive timing algorithm adjusts target durations based on participant performance, maintaining consistent task difficulty.

2. Task Flow

Block-Level Flow

Step

Description

Load Config

Load task configuration and subject form

Collect Subject Info

Collect demographic/subject info using SubInfo form

Setup Triggers

Initialize trigger sender using serial port (COM3)

Initialize Window/Input

Create PsychoPy window and keyboard handler

Load Stimuli

Load all stimuli via StimBank, convert instructions to voice, preload

Setup Controller

Create adaptive controller from config

Show Instructions

Present text and voice instruction before starting

Loop Over Blocks

For each block: countdown, run 60 trials, compute and show block feedback

Show Goodbye

Present final feedback with total score

Save Data

Save all trial data to CSV

Close

Close serial port and quit PsychoPy

Trial-Level Flow

Step

Description

Cue

Show condition-specific cue (win/lose/neutral) with trigger

Anticipation

Display fixation; allow response (early keypress logged)

Target

Show target with adaptive duration; record response

Pre-feedback Fixation

Display fixation before feedback

Feedback

Present hit/miss feedback based on performance

Adaptive Update

Update target duration based on hit/miss outcome

Controller Logic

Feature

Description

Adaptive Duration

Target duration adjusts between 0.04 and 0.37 seconds

Step Size

±0.03 seconds

Accuracy Target

66% accuracy threshold

Condition Specific

Tracks performance separately by condition (win/lose/neutral)

Logging

Performance logs are printed to PsychoPy console

3. Configuration Summary

a. Subject Info

Field

Meaning

subject_id

Unique participant number (101–999, 3 digits)

subname

Participant name (pinyin)

age

Participant age (5–60)

gender

Participant gender (Male/Female)

b. Window Settings

Parameter

Value

size

[1920, 1080]

units

deg

screen

1

bg_color

gray

fullscreen

True

monitor_width_cm

60

monitor_distance_cm

72

c. Stimuli

Name

Type

Description

fixation

text

Central cross “+”

win_cue

circle

Magenta circle (reward)

lose_cue

rect

Yellow square (punishment)

neut_cue

triangle

Cyan triangle (neutral)

win_target

circle

Black circle target

lose_target

rect

Black square target

neut_target

triangle

Black triangle target

win_hit_feedback

textbox

“击中 +10 分” (black text, SimHei)

win_miss_feedback

textbox

“未击中 +0 分”

lose_hit_feedback

textbox

“击中 -0 分”

lose_miss_feedback

textbox

“未击中 -10 分”

neut_hit_feedback

textbox

“击中 +0 分”

neut_miss_feedback

textbox

“未击中 -0 分”

instruction_text

textbox

Multi-line Chinese instructions (includes scoring rules)

block_break

text

Inter-block message showing block, accuracy, and score

good_bye

text

End screen showing final score

d. Timing

Phase

Duration (s)

cue

0.3

anticipation

random 1.0–1.2

target

adaptive (0.04–0.37)

prefeedback fixation

random 0.6–0.8

feedback

1.0

e. Triggers

Event

Code

exp_onset

98

exp_end

99

block_onset

100

block_end

101

win_cue_onset

10

win_anti_onset

11

win_target_onset

12

win_hit_fb_onset

13

win_miss_fb_onset

14

win_key_press

15

win_no_response

16

lose_cue_onset

20

lose_anti_onset

21

lose_target_onset

22

lose_hit_fb_onset

23

lose_miss_fb_onset

24

lose_key_press

25

lose_no_response

26

neut_cue_onset

30

neut_anti_onset

31

neut_target_onset

32

neut_hit_fb_onset

33

neut_miss_fb_onset

34

neut_key_press

35

neut_no_response

36

fixation_onset

1

f. Adaptive Controller

Parameter

Value

initial_duration

0.2

min_duration

0.04

max_duration

0.37

step

0.03

target_accuracy

0.66

condition_specific

true

4. Methods

Participants performed a computerized Monetary Incentive Delay (MID) task to assess motivational processing under different reward contingencies. The task consisted of 3 blocks, each comprising 60 trials, totaling 180 trials. Each trial began with a cue, a colored shape (circle, square, or triangle), signaling whether the trial was a reward, punishment, or neutral condition. Following a variable anticipation phase (1.0–1.2 s), a black target appeared briefly. Participants were instructed to press the spacebar as quickly as possible upon target onset.

The target’s presentation duration was controlled by an adaptive algorithm that updated the duration after each trial based on performance. Initial target duration was set to 0.2 s and was adjusted between 0.04 and 0.37 s using ±0.03 s increments to stabilize performance at a target accuracy of 66%, tracked separately by condition.

Feedback followed the target phase, based on whether participants responded within the target duration. “击中” (“hit”) and “未击中” (“miss”) messages were shown with point gain/loss specific to the cue type. After each block, a break screen summarized the participant’s accuracy and cumulative score. The task began with audio-visual instructions and ended with a final message displaying total score.

5. References

The task is originally developed by Knutson 2000:

Knutson, B., Westdorp, A., Kaiser, E., & Hommer, D. (2000). FMRI visualization of brain activity during a monetary incentive delay task. Neuroimage, 12(1), 20-27.

Here, we adopted the ABCD Study design of the task:

Casey, B. J., Cannonier, T., Conley, M. I., Cohen, A. O., Barch, D. M., Heitzeg, M. M., … & Dale, A. M. (2018). The adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD) study: imaging acquisition across 21 sites. Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 32, 43-54.